A Landing Pad for Soaring Rhetoric
Everyone says he is full of fluff, lacking details, simply offering lofty rhetoric. But I am a pretty logic based person, not usually swayed by flowery speeches. So I have sifted through the information that catches my eye and boiled it down. Along the lines of 'actions speak louder than words', here is what matters to me.
First, he pays his bills. Anytime there is a finance report put out he is the one candidate carrying no debt. He outspends every one and still pays his bills. It seems to me a pretty significant indication of fiscal responsibility. And Lord knows this country needs a leader who only spends within our means.
Second, he has found ways to raise money creatively. Its a three pronged approach really. Prong one, he seeks to register new voters, potraying his campaign as almost secondary to the goal of getting American citizens to embrace their right to vote.
The act of registering voters makes a political statement that indicates the candidate knows and respects the people he really works for. It fosters a sense of loyalty in these new voters and many of them become likely to cast their vote for him, which is really the second stop on the way to fundraising.
Because we all know that loyalty often translates to cash. And here is where he brings home his third step in the process. He actively asks for small donations, that the average voter does not find overwhelming. Historically people raising funds for various causes have all tried to drink from the same well, fancy fundraisers and rich people. Country Clubs see more politicians in a week than the average voter sees in a lifetime.
Obama has effectively drilled his own new well by recognizing that there are smaller increments of accessible funding out there which matter when they all add up.
Third, this process demonstrates his ability to strategize and 'think outside the box'. We should not underestimate the need for a leader who 'thinks outside the box'. Clearly our usual game plan is currently failing us miserably. We need a leader with fresh strategies, who sees things from a different perspective.
Fourth, his perspective on voters. Have you seen his political ads? Look at them carefully. They don't look like the usual political ads. No soundbites from other candidates, no emotional pictures of war, no gimmicks. The predominant stars in his ads are....general citizens, lots of them. Instead of messages to the voters, they are messages from the voters.
They don't attempt to tell voters what to think, rather they seem to be reporting what voters are thinking on their own. They portray him as more in touch with and connected to voters.
Its an indication of where his priorities lay and its a brilliant marketing strategy.
Fifth, he knows what to confront and what to blow off. Lapel pin? Yeah, sometimes I wear it sometimes I don't, enough said. Racial divide? Well, that needs a landmark speech. The man simply has good judgment about sorting out and prioritizing the important stuff from the junk.
Next...he is willing to confront tough stuff. That landmark speech about race relations in America is going to be studied in college classrooms for years. He said things that have been hanging in the air since Reconstruction, things that needed to be said so that we could all be challenged to move on from what is our greatest issue of division. That moment was akin to the end of Apartheid or the 'I Have a Dream' speech.
And.....he is calm and carries the demeanor of a level headed leader. Whatever has been thrown at him he has not bitten back. How easy would it have been to roast the Clintons....goodness knows the ammunition exists. And no I don't think he held it in because it was good for him. I think he held it in because that is his character.
He has made no snide sideways remarks that invoke assassinations or comparisons to failed and controversial campaigns.
He seems thoughtful, peaceful even. Maybe we have had enough discussion about kicking a#! and taking names. Maybe we need a little civility, a little calm on the International front.
His mouth has been where his money is. Simply put, he has worked his way up. He's the only candidate who has a long history of being in the trenches working with the poor, disenfranchised and average citizens. When it wasn't famous and didn't pay well he did the job anyway. Now he is asking for a newer version of the job he has done all along.
He didn't do social justice work for the poor and average citizens to earn points on the way to the Presidency, instead he wants the Presidency so he can continue that work.
Last, he apparently hires and manages good people. Often the best hallmark of a leader is how they hire. Great speech writers, great finance people, great strategists, great marketing, a great message and the ability to motivate and organize it all are the quintessential characteristics of a great leader.
If I was hiring for a CEO this candidate would be hard to beat. He's just what I'm looking for.
Meanwhile, Clinton and McCain use the same old tactics; look at my life in politics, let me highlight my competition in ads, let me call names politely. They are so busy talking at their competition that they have failed to talk to the American people. And instead of recognizing the difference in tactics and perhaps learning from it, they simply whine that Barack isn't using the same tactics they do.
His plan is winning, against great odds, theirs is losing. The American people can see the landing pad under the soaring rhetoric. And they like it.


